Golden apple snail (Pomacea canaliculata) as protein source on the growth performance of goldfish (Carassius gibelio) / Marishyrill V. Martinez, Charmagne T. Tabieros, Filipina B.Concepcion
Material type: TextLanguage: English Publisher: 2016Description: xiv, 75 leaves : illustrations ; 28.5 cmContent type:- text
- still image
- unmediated
- volume
- SH 167 M3665 2016
Item type | Current library | Collection | Call number | Copy number | Status | Date due | Barcode | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Theses and dissertations | Cardona College LIbrary General Stacks | Non-fiction | SH 167 M3665 2016 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Not for loan | URSCAR-UGT164 | ||
Theses and dissertations | Cardona College LIbrary General Stacks | Non-fiction | SH 167 M3665 2016 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 2 | Not for loan | URSCAR-UGT199 |
Experimental Research Methodology
Thesis BSF University of Rizal System. Cardona 2016
This study aims to determine the effects of golden apple snail as alternative source of protein on the growth performance of goldfish (C. Gibelio) such as weight, length, survival and FCR: to determine if there is a significant effect of goldfish fed by golden apple snail (pages Canaliculata) such as weight, length, survival and FCR. This study was conducted to find alternative cheap source of protein and to find appropriate feeding diet and the effects on the growth performance, in terms of length, weight, survival FCR of goldfish to help and to lessen the production cost in fish farming. The study utilized to Treatment; Treatment I Goldfish fingerlings fed with fishmeal mixed with rice bran. Treatment II - Goldfish fingerlings with golden apple snail mixed with rice bran. Findings affirmed that Treatment II which was formulated snail meal gave a better result in terms of length, weight, survival and FCR the Treatment I which was formulated fishmeal. In terms of length Treatment II was better than Treatment I with the mean length of 3.87 cm and 3.86 cm. it obtained the weight gain 1.22 and 1.21 cm respectively. In terms of weight treatment II was better than Treatment I with the mean weight of 4.07 grams and 3.99 grams. It obtained the weight gain of 3.04 grams and 2.96 grams respectively. The stocking density of goldfish was 45 pieces per treatment. In Treatment I, 41 fishes survived with the survival rate of 91.11% while Treatment II, 40 fishes of survived with the survival rate of 88.89%. There was a significant effect in terms of length gain and weight in both Treatment I and Treatment II. However, there was no significant difference on the effect of feed in Treatment I and Treatment II and in terms of survival, between Treatment I and Treatment II. There was a significant difference between Treatment II and Treatment I in terms of FCR.
Martinez, M. V., Tabieros, C. T. and Concepcion, F. B. (2016). Golden apple snail (Pomacea canaliculata) as protein source on the growth performance of goldfish (Carassius gibelio). Cardona: University of Rizal System.
There are no comments on this title.