Image from Google Jackets
Image from OpenLibrary

Rock this way : Cultural constructions of musical legitimacy / Mel Stanfill.

By: Material type: TextTextPublisher: Ann Arbor, Michigan : University of Michigan Press, 2023Description: 1 online resourceContent type:
  • text
Media type:
  • computer
Carrier type:
  • online resource
ISBN:
  • 9780472903627
  • 0472903624
Other title:
  • Cultural constructions of musical legitimacy
Subject(s): Additional physical formats: Print version:: Rock this wayDDC classification:
  • 346.04/82 23/eng/20230505
LOC classification:
  • ML3790
Online resources:
Contents:
Intro -- Contents -- Acknowledgments -- Introduction: Rock This Way, or the Shape of Musical Norms -- 1. Judge a Song by Its Cover: Cover Songs between Transformation and Extraction -- 2. Stir It Up: Remix and the Problem of Genre -- 3. Monstrous Mash: Mash-Ups and the Epistemology of Difference -- 4. Fight for Your Right to Parody: Parodies and the Cultural Politics of Kindness -- 5. Feels like the First Time: The Politics and Poetics of Similarity in Soundalikes -- Conclusion: Toward a Theory of Ethical Transformative Musical Works -- Data Appendix -- Notes -- References -- Index
Abstract: In order to analyze how transformative musical works are culturally understood, this book examines how mainstream press discourse talks about them. According to professional journalistic norms, press discussion is supposed to be neutral and balanced. This is, of course, a fiction, because press is to study social power relations, this is a benefit, not a drawback. In particular, norms of explaining "both sides" of an issue mean that a cross section of mainstream thought is available in the press, at the same time that more marginal perspectives are systematically excluded. Moreover, in addition to conveying what the journalist perceives to be a neutral account of a situation, the press helps frame public understanding of issues, thus contributing to making this the default understanding through presenting a hegemonic view as the truth. For these reasons, Stanfill uses press coverage to examine social beliefs circulating widely about transformative musical works. In doing so, she specifically abstracts away from particular journalists and their identities (racial, gender, or others) because, by those same professional norms, individual perspectives are supposed to be suppressed in the name of a (white and masculine) construct of universality. Moreover, an individual journalist presenting an opinion (whether they are aware of doing so or not) is not in itself meaningful, but when there are patterns in opinions across multiple articles, by different people, in different locations and at different moments, they become suggestive of a broader hegemonic formation.
Tags from this library: No tags from this library for this title.
Star ratings
    Average rating: 0.0 (0 votes)
Holdings
Item type Current library Call number Status Date due Barcode
E-Book E-Book JSTOR Open Access Books Available

Court cases listed in "References" (page 201).

Includes bibliographical references (pages 201-221) and index.

In order to analyze how transformative musical works are culturally understood, this book examines how mainstream press discourse talks about them. According to professional journalistic norms, press discussion is supposed to be neutral and balanced. This is, of course, a fiction, because press is to study social power relations, this is a benefit, not a drawback. In particular, norms of explaining "both sides" of an issue mean that a cross section of mainstream thought is available in the press, at the same time that more marginal perspectives are systematically excluded. Moreover, in addition to conveying what the journalist perceives to be a neutral account of a situation, the press helps frame public understanding of issues, thus contributing to making this the default understanding through presenting a hegemonic view as the truth. For these reasons, Stanfill uses press coverage to examine social beliefs circulating widely about transformative musical works. In doing so, she specifically abstracts away from particular journalists and their identities (racial, gender, or others) because, by those same professional norms, individual perspectives are supposed to be suppressed in the name of a (white and masculine) construct of universality. Moreover, an individual journalist presenting an opinion (whether they are aware of doing so or not) is not in itself meaningful, but when there are patterns in opinions across multiple articles, by different people, in different locations and at different moments, they become suggestive of a broader hegemonic formation.

Description based on print version record and CIP data provided by publisher; resource not viewed.

Intro -- Contents -- Acknowledgments -- Introduction: Rock This Way, or the Shape of Musical Norms -- 1. Judge a Song by Its Cover: Cover Songs between Transformation and Extraction -- 2. Stir It Up: Remix and the Problem of Genre -- 3. Monstrous Mash: Mash-Ups and the Epistemology of Difference -- 4. Fight for Your Right to Parody: Parodies and the Cultural Politics of Kindness -- 5. Feels like the First Time: The Politics and Poetics of Similarity in Soundalikes -- Conclusion: Toward a Theory of Ethical Transformative Musical Works -- Data Appendix -- Notes -- References -- Index

Open access

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial-NoDerivatives

https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0

JSTOR Books at JSTOR Open Access

There are no comments on this title.

to post a comment.

University of Rizal System
Email us at univlibservices@urs.edu.ph

Visit our Website www.urs.edu.ph/library

Powered by Koha