Image from Google Jackets
Image from OpenLibrary

The Oil Wars Myth : Petroleum and the Causes of International Conflict / Emily Meierding.

By: Material type: TextTextLanguage: English Publisher: Ithaca, NY : Cornell University Press, [2021]Copyright date: ©2021Description: 1 online resource (256 p.) : 5 mapsContent type:
  • text
Media type:
  • computer
Carrier type:
  • online resource
ISBN:
  • 9781501748950
Subject(s): DDC classification:
  • 338.27280904 23
LOC classification:
  • HD9560.6 .M44 2021
Other classification:
  • MK 3000
Online resources:
Contents:
Frontmatter -- Contents -- Tables and Maps -- Acknowledgments -- Introduction: Blood and Oil -- 1. From Value to Violence: Connecting Oil and War -- 2. Explaining the Oil Wars Myth: Mad Max and El Dorado -- 3. Why Classic Oil Wars Do Not Pay -- 4. Searching for Classic Oil Wars -- 5. Red Herrings: The Chaco and Iran-Iraq Wars -- 6. Oil Spats: The Falkland/Malvinas Islands Dispute -- 7. Oil Campaigns: World War II -- 8. Oil Gambit: Iraq's Invasion of Kuwait -- Conclusion: Petro-Myths and Petro-Realities -- Notes -- Index
Summary: Do countries fight wars for oil? Given the resource's exceptional military and economic importance, most people assume that states will do anything to obtain it. Challenging this conventional wisdom, The Oil Wars Myth reveals that countries do not launch major conflicts to acquire petroleum resources. Emily Meierding argues that the costs of foreign invasion, territorial occupation, international retaliation, and damage to oil company relations deter even the most powerful countries from initiating "classic oil wars." Examining a century of interstate violence, she demonstrates that, at most, countries have engaged in mild sparring to advance their petroleum ambitions.The Oil Wars Myth elaborates on these findings by reassessing the presumed oil motives for many of the twentieth century's most prominent international conflicts: World War II, the two American Gulf wars, the Iran-Iraq War, the Falklands/Malvinas War, and the Chaco War. These case studies show that countries have consistently refrained from fighting for oil. Meierding also explains why oil war assumptions are so common, despite the lack of supporting evidence. Since classic oil wars exist at the intersection of need and greed-two popular explanations for resource grabs-they are unusually easy to believe in.The Oil Wars Myth will engage and inform anyone interested in oil, war, and the narratives that connect them.
Tags from this library: No tags from this library for this title.
Star ratings
    Average rating: 0.0 (0 votes)
Holdings
Item type Current library Call number Status Date due Barcode
E-Book E-Book De Gruyter Available

Frontmatter -- Contents -- Tables and Maps -- Acknowledgments -- Introduction: Blood and Oil -- 1. From Value to Violence: Connecting Oil and War -- 2. Explaining the Oil Wars Myth: Mad Max and El Dorado -- 3. Why Classic Oil Wars Do Not Pay -- 4. Searching for Classic Oil Wars -- 5. Red Herrings: The Chaco and Iran-Iraq Wars -- 6. Oil Spats: The Falkland/Malvinas Islands Dispute -- 7. Oil Campaigns: World War II -- 8. Oil Gambit: Iraq's Invasion of Kuwait -- Conclusion: Petro-Myths and Petro-Realities -- Notes -- Index

Open Access unrestricted online access star

https://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2

Do countries fight wars for oil? Given the resource's exceptional military and economic importance, most people assume that states will do anything to obtain it. Challenging this conventional wisdom, The Oil Wars Myth reveals that countries do not launch major conflicts to acquire petroleum resources. Emily Meierding argues that the costs of foreign invasion, territorial occupation, international retaliation, and damage to oil company relations deter even the most powerful countries from initiating "classic oil wars." Examining a century of interstate violence, she demonstrates that, at most, countries have engaged in mild sparring to advance their petroleum ambitions.The Oil Wars Myth elaborates on these findings by reassessing the presumed oil motives for many of the twentieth century's most prominent international conflicts: World War II, the two American Gulf wars, the Iran-Iraq War, the Falklands/Malvinas War, and the Chaco War. These case studies show that countries have consistently refrained from fighting for oil. Meierding also explains why oil war assumptions are so common, despite the lack of supporting evidence. Since classic oil wars exist at the intersection of need and greed-two popular explanations for resource grabs-they are unusually easy to believe in.The Oil Wars Myth will engage and inform anyone interested in oil, war, and the narratives that connect them.

Mode of access: Internet via World Wide Web.

This eBook is made available Open Access under a CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 license:

https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0

https://www.degruyter.com/dg/page/open-access-policy

In English.

Description based on online resource; title from PDF title page (publisher's Web site, viewed 01. Dez 2022)

There are no comments on this title.

to post a comment.

University of Rizal System
Email us at univlibservices@urs.edu.ph

Visit our Website www.urs.edu.ph/library

Powered by Koha