| 000 | 07777cam a2200529Ii 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | PHURS | ||
| 005 | 20221125083342.0 | ||
| 008 | 160309t20162016caub ob 000 0 eng d | ||
| 040 |
_aDOS _beng _erda _epn _cDOS _dOCLCO _dJSTOR _dOCLCO _dCUS _dYDXCP _dCOO _dICG _dVFL _dLOA _dLND _dUWO _dBUF _dIOG _dU3W _dOCLCF _dICN _dCEF _dOCLCQ _dERL _dESU _dWYU _dTXR _dCNTRU _dK6U _dHS0 _dNJT _dRDF _dUKBTH _dVT2 _dUPM _dMERER _dU9X _dLDP _dEQF _dBRF _dUWK _dSXB _dKIJ _dEUN _dSDF _dUEJ _dUAB _dS2H _dOCLCQ _dOCLCO _dAAA _dOCLCO |
||
| 020 |
_a9780833095213 _q(electronic bk.) |
||
| 020 |
_a0833095218 _q(electronic bk.) |
||
| 050 | 4 |
_aJV6477 _b.K37 2016eb online |
|
| 100 | 1 |
_aKaroly, Lynn A., _d1961- _eauthor. _0http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n91110097 |
|
| 245 | 1 | 2 |
_aA cost-benefit framework for analyzing the economic and fiscal impacts of state-level immigration policies / _cLynn A. Karoly, Francisco Perez-Arce. |
| 264 | 1 |
_aSanta Monica, Calif. : _bRAND, _c[2016] |
|
| 264 | 4 | _c©2016 | |
| 300 |
_a1 online resource (xxiii, 95 pages) : _bcolor maps. |
||
| 336 |
_atext _btxt _2rdacontent |
||
| 337 |
_acomputer _bc _2rdamedia |
||
| 338 |
_aonline resource _bcr _2rdacarrier |
||
| 490 | 1 |
_aResearch report ; _vRR-1397-MCF |
|
| 500 | _a"March 8, 2016"--Table of contents page. | ||
| 504 | _aIncludes bibliographical references (pages 83-95). | ||
| 505 | 0 | _a1. Introduction -- 2. Landscape of state-level immigration policies -- 3. Framework for analyzing state-level immigration policies -- 4. Analysis of existing CBAs of state-level immigration policy -- 5. Conclusions and policy implications. | |
| 505 | 0 | _aPreface -- Figures -- Tables and Text Boxes -- Summary -- Acknowledgments -- Abbreviations -- 1. Introduction -- 2. Landscape of State-Level Immigration Policies: Overview of State-Level Immigration Policy Action -- State-Level Omnibus Legislation -- State-Level Specific Policies -- Summary of State Policies -- 3. Framework for Analyzing State-Level Immigration Policies: Overview of Approach -- Expected Effect of State-Level Policies on the Number of Immigrants -- Framework Applied to State and Local Immigration-Related Law Enforcement Policies -- Framework Applied to E-Verify and Other Status Verification Systems -- Framework Applied to Omnibus Legislation or Multiple Restrictive Policies -- Framework Applied to Eligibility for In-State Tuition and Other Financial Aid -- Framework Applied to Driver's License Eligibility -- Framework Applied to Health Care Access for Pregnant Women and Children -- 4. Analysis of Existing CBAs of State-Level Immigration Policy: Existing Literature on Costs and Benefits of State-Level Immigration Policies -- Assessment of a CBA of the Maryland Dream Act -- Assessment of a CBA of California's Proposition 187 Provision Regarding Access to Publicly Funded Health Care -- 5. Conclusions and Policy Implications: Key Findings -- Implications for Policy -- References. | |
| 520 | _a"Traditionally, immigration policy has been a federal responsibility but, in the past decade, states have begun to adopt policies through legislation and other actions to respond to trends in unauthorized immigration. Some states have adopted restrictive policies toward unauthorized immigrants, such as expanding state and local enforcement of immigration laws, requiring employers to verify employment eligibility, and precluding access to driver's licenses or in-state tuition for public higher education. Other states have adopted policies that are unrestrictive -- for example, making driver's licenses and in-state tuition available regardless of immigration status. The expanding role of states in these areas of policy raises questions about the consequences of state-level action for various stakeholders in the public and private sectors. This report features a cost-benefit framework for classifying the potential impacts of specific state-level immigration-related policies, identifying the potential domains of impact and how different stakeholders in the public and private sectors would be affected. The authors also review research literature to identify empirical evidence, where it exists, regarding the likely magnitudes of the impacts of specific state-level immigration-related policies, and use the cost-benefit framework, together with the assembled empirical evidence, to assess the rigor and relevance of existing studies of the fiscal and economic impacts of specific state-level immigration policy actions. This study should be of interest to policymakers at all levels of government, as well stakeholders in the private sector, focused on state-level immigration policy and the costs and benefits associated with state policy actions pertaining to unauthorized immigrants"--Publisher's description. | ||
| 588 | 0 | _aOnline resource; title from PDF title page (RAND, viewed March 8, 2016). | |
| 590 |
_aJSTOR _bBooks at JSTOR Open Access |
||
| 651 | 0 |
_aUnited States _xEmigration and immigration _xPolitical aspects _y21st century. |
|
| 651 | 0 |
_aUnited States _xEmigration and immigration _xEconomic aspects. |
|
| 650 | 0 |
_aImmigrants _xServices for _xCost effectiveness. |
|
| 651 | 0 |
_aUnited States _xSocial policy _y21st century. |
|
| 651 | 6 |
_aÉtats-Unis _xPolitique sociale _y21e siècle. |
|
| 650 | 7 |
_aEmigration and immigration _xEconomic aspects. |
|
| 650 | 7 |
_aEmigration and immigration _xPolitical aspects. |
|
| 650 | 7 | _aSocial policy. | |
| 651 | 7 | _aUnited States. | |
| 655 | 0 | _aElectronic books. | |
| 655 | 4 | _aElectronic books. | |
| 700 | 1 |
_aNovaro, Francisco Perez Arce, _d1979- _eauthor. _0http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/no2011025940 |
|
| 710 | 2 |
_aRand Corporation, _epublisher, _eissuing body. _0http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n78083407 |
|
| 830 | 0 |
_aResearch report (Rand Corporation) ; _vRR-1397-MCF. _0http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/no2013072664 |
|
| 856 | 4 | 0 | _uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/10.7249/j.ctt1btc0p8 |
| 880 |
_6520-00/(Q _a"Traditionally, immigration policy has been a federal responsibility but, in the past decade, states have begun to adopt policies through legislation and other actions to respond to trends in unauthorized immigration. Some states have adopted restrictive policies toward unauthorized immigrants, such as expanding state and local enforcement of immigration laws, requiring employers to verify employment eligibility, and precluding access to driver's licenses or in-state tuition for public higher education. Other states have adopted policies that are unrestrictive ђ́ؤ for example, making driver's licenses and in-state tuition available regardless of immigration status. The expanding role of states in these areas of policy raises questions about the consequences of state-level action for various stakeholders in the public and private sectors. This report features a cost-benefit framework for classifying the potential impacts of specific state-level immigration-related policies, identifying the potential domains of impact and how different stakeholders in the public and private sectors would be affected. The authors also review research literature to identify empirical evidence, where it exists, regarding the likely magnitudes of the impacts of specific state-level immigration-related policies, and use the cost-benefit framework, together with the assembled empirical evidence, to assess the rigor and relevance of existing studies of the fiscal and economic impacts of specific state-level immigration policy actions. This study should be of interest to policymakers at all levels of government, as well stakeholders in the private sector, focused on state-level immigration policy and the costs and benefits associated with state policy actions pertaining to unauthorized immigrants"--Publisher's description. |
||
| 942 |
_2lcc _cE-BOOK |
||
| 994 |
_a92 _bPHURS |
||
| 999 |
_c57264 _d57264 |
||