TY  - BOOK
AU  - Kaptein,Hendrik
AU  - Van der Velden,Bastiaan
TI  - Analogy and Exemplary Reasoning in Legal Discourse
SN  - 9789048537143
AV  - K212 
PY  - 2017///
CY  - Amsterdam
PB  - Amsterdam University Press
KW  - Law
KW  - Methodology
KW  - Analogy
KW  - LAW
KW  - Essays
KW  - General Practice
KW  - Jurisprudence
KW  - Paralegals & Paralegalism
KW  - Practical Guides
KW  - Reference
KW  - General
KW  - Electronic books
N1  - Frontmatter --; Table of contents --; Introduction --; 1. Imitation and analogy; Amaya, Amalia --; 2. Indefeasible analogical argument; Brewer, Scott --; 3. Is analogy a form of legal reasoning?; Brożek, Bartosz --; 4. Analogical reasoning and extensive interpretation; Canale, Damiano / Tuzet, Giovanni --; 5. Analogy and balancing; Duarte, David --; 6. Analogy and balancing; Brożek, Bartosz --; 7. Analogy and balancing once again; Duarte, David --; 8. Argument by analogy in the law; Golding, Martin --; 9. Undoing damage by analogy; Kaptein, Hendrik --; 10. Analogy in the strict liability rules in the Dutch Civil Code; Velden, Bastiaan van der --; Bibliography --; Index
N2  - This book brings together contributions from leading figures in legal studies on analogy and related forms of reasoning in the law. Analogical reasoning--which relies on the concept of two different things being in some way like each other--is hugely important not just in the practice of law, but it is nonetheless strongly contested. This volume raises key questions like: What is the logical, argumentative, rhetorical, or just heuristic force of analogy in law? Is analogy really different from extensive interpretation, reasoning by precedent and appeal to paradigm?
UR  - https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.2307/j.ctv62hfhb
ER  -