000 02061nam a2200253Ia 4500
000 03146naaa 00517uu
001 https://directory.doabooks.org/handle/20.500.12854/26539
008 211013s9999 xx 000 0 und d
024 _a10.2307/j.ctt1vxm8p6
042 _adc
100 1 _aMaxwell, Nicholas
245 0 _aKarl Popper, Science and Enightenment
260 _bUCL Press
_c2017
300 _a1 electronic resource (390 p.)
520 _aHere is an idea that just might save the world. It is that science, properly understood, provides us with the methodological key to the salvation of humanity. A version of this idea can be found in the works of Karl Popper. Famously, Popper argued that science cannot verify theories but can only refute them, and this is how science makes progress. Scientists are forced to think up something better, and it is this, according to Popper, that drives science forward. But Nicholas Maxwell finds a flaw in this line of argument. Physicists only ever accept theories that are unified - theories that depict the same laws applying to the range of phenomena to which the theory applies - even though many other empirically more successful disunified theories are always available. This means that science makes a questionable assumption about the universe, namely that all disunified theories are false. Without some such presupposition as this, the whole empirical method of science breaks down. By proposing a new conception of scientific methodology, which can be applied to all worthwhile human endeavours with problematic aims, Maxwell argues for a revolution in academic inquiry to help humanity make progress towards a better, more civilized and enlightened world.
540 _aCreative Commons
653 _acivilization
700 1 _aMaxwell, Nicholas
856 _uhttps://library.oapen.org/bitstream/20.500.12657/31176/1/636791.pdf
856 _uhttps://library.oapen.org/bitstream/20.500.12657/31176/1/636791.pdf
856 _uwww.oapen.org
942 _cE-BOOK
999 _c48936
_d48936