000			03257nam a22002777a 4500
003			URS
005			20250717105110.0
008			250717b |||||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
050			_aBSE-TLE _b.Es74 2014
245			_aDevelopment and validation of learning guide for basic drafting technology (TLE 9) subject / _cAngela Vida J. Escabas...[and three others].
260			_c©2014.
300			_aix, 68 leaves : _billustrations (some colour) ; _c28 cm.
336			_2rdacontent _atext
336			_2rdacontent _astill image
337			_2rdamedia _aunmediated
338			_2rdacarrier _avolume
502			_aThesis _bBachelor of Secondary Education Major in in Technology and Livelihood Education _cUniversity of Rizal System - Taytay _d2014
504			_aIncludes bibliographical references.
520			_aThis study sought to develop a validated learning guide in Basic Drafting Technology (TLE 9) subject. The study was conducted during school year 2013 -2014. The respondents were the instructors/professors of drafting technology of the College of Education in University of Rizal System -Morong Campus. The study utilized the descriptive method of research using a questionnaire checklist as the main instrument in gathering the necessary data. The frequency and percentage distribution, weighted mean and standard deviation were used to know the profile of the respondents and F-test (One way Anova) was utilized to treat the data statistically. Majority of the respondents in terms of age belong to age bracket of 46 and above. When in terms of educational attainment each respondent differ to each other, 1 respondent was a college graduate with 22 years in service, while the other one has a master's degree with 24 years in teaching career and the last one has a doctorate degree with 28 years of teaching experience. Weighted mean and standard deviation was used to determine the acceptability of the developed learning guide in terms of objective, relevance, format and style, and usability. Based on the findings, the objectives of the developed learning guide ranked first and obtained a computed mean of 4.59 and a standard deviation of 577 was verbally interpreted as very much accepted. Relevance ranked second with a computed mean of 4.09 and a standard deviation of 789 with a verbal interpretation as much accepted. In terms of format and style all agreed that is much accepted with a computed mean of 4.00 and a standard deviation of 789 with a verbal interpreted as much accepted. In terms of usability, the findings revealed that it was accepted with a computed mean of 3.83 and standard deviation of .394. The average mean was 4.18 with standard deviation of 637 and verbally interpreted as Much Accepted. This implies that the learning guide as assessed by the faculty respondents will be useful in developing skills and attitudes of the students which are essential to effective learning.
700			_92828 _aEscabas, Angela Vida J., _eauthor.
700			_aJanapin, Pia Z., _eauthor.
700			_aSilvela, Joan S., _eauthor.
700			_aUrbano, Jose Angelo Mari F., _eauthor
856			_3Online Request for Student Unpublished Works _uhttps://forms.gle/7LqvGGkaDrUQqz429
942			_2lcc _cT
999			_c83658 _d83657