Development, Validation and Acceptability of Modules in Science and Technology for Grade 7 students Alwin T. Alfaro
Material type:
TextDescription: Viii, 83pages, illustrations 28cmContent type: - text
- unmediated
- volume
- LG221.R59.Al283 2013
| Cover image | Item type | Current library | Home library | Collection | Shelving location | Call number | Materials specified | Vol info | URL | Copy number | Status | Notes | Date due | Barcode | Item holds | Item hold queue priority | Course reserves | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Theses and dissertations
|
Rodriguez College Library Graduate School Theses & Dissertations | LG221.R59.Al283 2013 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | C1 | Not For Loan | URSROD-UGT-0791 | |||||||||||||
Theses and dissertations
|
Rodriguez College Library Graduate School Theses & Dissertations | LG221.R59.Al283 2013 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | C2 | Not For Loan | URSROD-UGT-0792 |
Browsing Rodriguez College Library shelves,Shelving location: Graduate School Theses & Dissertations Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
GSTHESIS Bachelor of Secondary Education major in Biological Science
University of Rizal System, Rodriguez, Rizal
2013
Title: "DEVELOPMENT, VALIDATION AND ACCEPTABILITY OF MODULES IN SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY FOR GRADE 7 STUDENTS
Authors: Alwin T. Alfaro
Jonathan G. Robles Jr.
Course: Bachelor of Secondary Education Major in Biological Science
Type of Document: Undergraduate Thesis
Total number of pages: 95
Name and Address of the School:
University of Rizal System
College of Education
Rodriguez, Rizal
Summary:
This study aimed to develop, validate and determine the level of acceptability of Science and Technology modules which served as supplementary instructional material for the students. This study was conducted during the School Year 2013-2014 at San Jose National High School.
Specifically, the study sought to answer the questions on the mean scores of the student-respondents in pretest and posttest in terms of the following covered topics in modules: Motion, Wave, Sound, Light, Heat and Electricity and if there is significant difference between the mean scores of the tests. The level of acceptability of the modules as perceived by the Science Teachers in terms of Objectives, Contents, Activities, Organization, Creativity, Style and Presentation and Evaluation was also determined.
You sent
The study made ose of experimental method utilizing songle group protest-posttest design and descriptive method aulsang evaluative design
The respondents of the study were composed of six (fi) Scince Teachers and thirty (30) Grade 7 students from San Jose National Hight School and two (5) Science Professors Dom Lsivonity of Riad System-Rodriguce.
The instruments used in the stady were the 60-item teacher made test in the 6 topics to validate the modules and a questionnaire checklist to evaluate the modules
On the validity of the modules and test, content validity was used with the help of experts who criticized the module. Then, test made use of table of specification. Pilot testing came afier and it undergo item analysis and reliability test with the result of 0.76 aing split-half test it determine the correlation of the test
The pretest and posttest was conducted to validate the modules. After gathering the scores of pretest and posttest, the application of appropriate statistical treatment and analysis and interpretation of data were used.
On the mean scores of the student-respondents in the pretest and postest of 6 topics, it was shown that the mean score increased from 33.07 in the pretest to 41.67 in the postiest.
On the significant difference between the mean scores, the p-value 10.000 is less than 0.05 level of significance, therefore, the null hypothesis is rejected.
On the acceptability of Science and Technology modules as evaluated from the adapted questionnaire checklist of the faculty-respondents, with respect to objectives it has a weighted mean of 4.63, content has weighted mean of 4.42, activities has weighted mean of 4.91, organization has weighted mean of 4.48, creativity has weighted mean of
There are no comments on this title.